arkfeld.com

Articles

Electronic Discovery

• When Vendors Let You Down

• Digital Repositories: Fact or Fiction?

• Electronic Discovery Here To Stay

• Zubulake I through IV – Cost Allocation for Electronic Discovery

• A Call for Collaborative Action

Change

• Head in the Sand or A Walk in the Clouds?

• Transitioning to a Digital Practice of Law

• E-Mail - Killer Application for the '90s

• The Near Future Practice of Law

• Practicing Law @The Speed of Thought

Courts

• Accessing Justice for All

• The Internet and the Justice System – An Unbeatable Combination

• Are Court Records Commodities?

• Selling Out the Data in the Judicial System – a Shameful Legacy

Law Firms

• Survival of the Law Firm:
  Is Your Legal Future Secure?

• Secure Your Computer Data

• Security Precautions in Sending Computer Word Processing Files to Opposing Counsel

• Show Me Your Website! Building or Rebuilding and Marketing Your Website

• Internet and E-mail Acceptable Use Policies (AUP)

• Presentation Software for any Budget

Newsletters Index

March, 2005

April, 2005

Feb., 2006

Noteworthy Decisions & Rules

Qualcomm

• Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., CIV. 05-1958, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 911 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2008).
  

Zubulake decisions

• Zubulake I (S.D.N.Y. May 13, 2003)

• Zubulake II (S.D.N.Y. May 13, 2003)

• Zubulake III (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 24, 2003)

• Zubulake IV (S.D.N.Y. Oct.22, 2003)

• Zubulake V (S.D.N.Y. July 20, 2004)

Morgan Stanley

• Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 2005 WL 67071 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Mar. 1, 2005), 955 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 4th CA 2007). rev’d on other grounds,

Electronic Discovery Decisions - 50 States

• Click here

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

• Cornell Law School - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure